NEWS

Advice for a new GM

  • 26 Replies
  • 6893 Views

myrddin000

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 16
« on: <04-04-13/1014:39> »
Hello All, I am planning to start a SR4A game with my mates. I've spent the last couple of weeks pouring over ALL the books and have (what I think) a really good grasp on the game. They nor I have ever played before. I'd like some advice on the order in which to  introduce them to the game. My plan so far: introduce the world and brief history of the SR universe, explain runner archetypes, explain skills, exlpain general combat, give an overview of the Matrix/Astral Space, explain hacking/cybercombat/programs/rigging/etc., and then dive in with the pregen. options in the Quick Start rules.Is this a good layout? Anything to add or change?
"Brute force: if its not working, you're not using enough"

emsquared

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • Super Perfundo
« Reply #1 on: <04-04-13/1158:58> »
I'd recommend keeping things low-power to start, by which I mean primary pools around 12 for your players (but no more than 15 modified - so after Smartguns and Personalized Grips and everything) and even less for their opposition. And be realistic (and encourage your players to do the same) about being shot. If you take 9 boxes of damage - you're probably not going to keep shooting. Runners probably have more reason to go to the bitter end (like avoiding being locked-up for life), but most rent-a-cops aren't going to keep fighting until they die. I would have most night-watch or rent-a-cop type security type personnel or Gangers make a Composure Test (Wound Modifier Level), to even shoot each pass once the've been hit (instead they take cover). Lonestar or more security-professional types, leader types and/or other runner types wouldn't have to make one until they've taken -3 wound modifiers or get Knocked Down or something, and then maybe have it at the wound modifier level +/- (depending on how you look at it) 1 or 2. So, a 3 wound modifier would be a Composure (1 or 2) Test - depending on how stalwart you want them to be. Anyway, there's things you can do to scale back the lethality and might even make it more interesting - what do you do with a wounded guard? - you want them to learn, not fear for their lives - yet... You can step it up later.

myrddin000

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 16
« Reply #2 on: <04-04-13/1644:41> »
Thanks! yeah that's about what I was thinking.
"Brute force: if its not working, you're not using enough"

Mirikon

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 8986
  • "Everybody lies." --House
« Reply #3 on: <04-04-13/1650:31> »
My advice? Running them through the Food Fight in the quick start rules is a good way to introduce them to the combat system. Also, get the Runner's Toolkit. Cheat sheets and the Anatomy of a Shadowrun file are godsends. Especially that second one. Side-by-side trail of fluff and game info as a team goes through planning, scouting, and executing a run. After that, pick up the Missions series, and run one or two of those. They are good, low-level adventures that can be taken separately, or be turned into a campaign. For the love of all that's holy, don't start your group off on things like Dawn of the Artifacts or On the Run.
Greataxe - Apply directly to source of problem, repeat as needed.

My Characters

myrddin000

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 16
« Reply #4 on: <04-04-13/1653:55> »
I'll download those right away!
"Brute force: if its not working, you're not using enough"

dertechie

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 61
« Reply #5 on: <04-06-13/2313:53> »
My advice? Running them through the Food Fight in the quick start rules is a good way to introduce them to the combat system. Also, get the Runner's Toolkit. Cheat sheets and the Anatomy of a Shadowrun file are godsends. Especially that second one. Side-by-side trail of fluff and game info as a team goes through planning, scouting, and executing a run. After that, pick up the Missions series, and run one or two of those. They are good, low-level adventures that can be taken separately, or be turned into a campaign. For the love of all that's holy, don't start your group off on things like Dawn of the Artifacts or On the Run.

I'm going to second this.  Food Fight and Runner's Toolkit are great starter material.  Mind, I ran Food Fight with characters I'd built (and thus a considerably more optimized Runner crew), so I didn't get a chance to do much of the food everywhere shenanigans you get when you use the (much lower powered) pregens, as 3 characters pulverized the 4 hit men in 2 rounds even with a slightly beefed up encounter (and the second round was mostly mop-up).  The rest of the session was pretty much a bull session while they ran after Mel Cozi for some vengeance/hooding.

Belker

  • *
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Omae
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
  • The Butcher
« Reply #6 on: <04-08-13/0945:55> »
As far as starter missions go, how does the Elven Blood series rate? I like the idea of relatively short, self-contained arc to get my players and I into things.
"Dog says to always wear your seatbelts, kiddies."
Missions Freelancer (CMP 2015 - The Tennessee Suite 1-4)

Mirikon

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 8986
  • "Everybody lies." --House
« Reply #7 on: <04-08-13/1232:49> »
Because you deal with things like hopping borders and gang politics, not to mention all the wonderful implied racism when dealing with the Ancients and the Tir, I'd wait until they were immersed in the setting first. As things go, they're nice, low-level adventures, but I'd toss a Mission or two at them first, just so they can get the attitude down before they (potentially) piss off the new leader of the local chapter of one of the biggest gangs on the West Coast.
Greataxe - Apply directly to source of problem, repeat as needed.

My Characters

Critias

  • *
  • Freelancer
  • Prime Runner
  • ***
  • Posts: 2521
  • Company Elf
« Reply #8 on: <04-08-13/1235:04> »
As far as starter missions go, how does the Elven Blood series rate? I like the idea of relatively short, self-contained arc to get my players and I into things.
They were written to be Missions compatible, which means trying to make them accessible to a half-dozen new players who just randomly met up at a convention, while allowing them to be scaled up to 30+ die pool monstrosities sitting on a couple hundred karma.  Most of the scenes and conflicts err on the lower side (with GM advice for how to scale it up), though, especially in Ancient Pawns and Hopping the Fence, the first two adventures. 

There are encounters that can be made particularly nasty (just based on what the GM wants to do), and there are situations that can be especially lethal (if the players can't keep their yaps shut in a few places, or don't try to stack the deck before a big fight)...but for the most part they should work just fine for new-ish players, if the GM takes the time to get comfortable with them in advance, and/or tailors them to fit groups that might not be as optimized as more diehard players.  They were written to match up to archetype-level characters, potentially (because, again: random convention team).

That said, you might want to get them more involved in the setting (and Seattle, or where-ever you want to have your main game), before hauling them down into the Tir and tangling them up in politics and other nations and whatnot.

Belker

  • *
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Omae
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
  • The Butcher
« Reply #9 on: <04-08-13/1248:57> »
In my case, both my players and I are quite familiar with the overall setting, though I think I'm the only one really up on the current continuity. Myself and two of the players are 1E/2E vets and the other player is a 3E/4E guy, so we're needing more of a mechanical introduction than a setting one.

Does sound like I might want to pick something else after Food Fight, though.
"Dog says to always wear your seatbelts, kiddies."
Missions Freelancer (CMP 2015 - The Tennessee Suite 1-4)

All4BigGuns

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 7531
« Reply #10 on: <04-08-13/1252:03> »
In my case, both my players and I are quite familiar with the overall setting, though I think I'm the only one really up on the current continuity. Myself and two of the players are 1E/2E vets and the other player is a 3E/4E guy, so we're needing more of a mechanical introduction than a setting one.

Does sound like I might want to pick something else after Food Fight, though.

Everyone should go through Food Fight at least once. Heck, I think I've been through it three times.

[spoiler]
All three times, the caster opponent killed--not knocked out but killed--himself with his Lightning Bolt, critically glitching the Drain resist each time.
[/spoiler]
(SR5) Homebrew Archetypes

Tangled Currents (Persistent): 33 Karma, 60,000 nuyen

summers307

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 59
  • Plan attack for 4 hours, then kick in the door.
« Reply #11 on: <04-17-13/0518:47> »
My two cents; Keep matrix and magic to a minimum to start (the PC's can play as them, but baby step through it), along with the low tech mentioned previously. Definitely use the karma awarding for PC's who are in character and those who play in character well. This should encourage them to flesh out who they are playing as (which is what stands Shadowrun apart from other table tops, there I said it).

Use the players contacts as plot points from time to time. On that note, make sure that if they have contacts they actually flesh them out (or at least have a paragraphs worth of history). This rewards the PC's for taking time and helps you in the long run with plot points.

I'm new to this too, so by all means don't take my word for it. Feel free to PM me if you wanna swap stories/campaigns/ideas/blahblahblah. Us new DM's need to have each others backs.
Watch your mouth punk, I'll sell your commlink address to every porn site from here to Beijing.

Willo

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 2
« Reply #12 on: <04-17-13/0649:04> »
I myself am new to the GMing of this game and our little group of 4 runners is about to start our first session Friday night. One of the previous posts mentioned dont use "on the run" from the runners toolkit. I picked it up the other day and flipping through it (on the run) seemed alright to use as a starting point. Our guys have NO role play experience at all and I have been trying to give them the gist of the setting which they have taken to enthusiastically.

So just wanted some pointers as to why on the run would be a mistake to start the guys off on their RPG path.


All4BigGuns

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 7531
« Reply #13 on: <04-17-13/0939:20> »
I myself am new to the GMing of this game and our little group of 4 runners is about to start our first session Friday night. One of the previous posts mentioned dont use "on the run" from the runners toolkit. I picked it up the other day and flipping through it (on the run) seemed alright to use as a starting point. Our guys have NO role play experience at all and I have been trying to give them the gist of the setting which they have taken to enthusiastically.

So just wanted some pointers as to why on the run would be a mistake to start the guys off on their RPG path.

On the Run is a piss-poor example of a good run in that in order for the players to actually get into around 75% of the 'adventure', their characters would have to be completely unprofessional and question (and dig into) the motives surrounding the Johnson's hiring them. Really, if a team did this, they would probably never get work that paid more than 10 nuyen again.
(SR5) Homebrew Archetypes

Tangled Currents (Persistent): 33 Karma, 60,000 nuyen

Mirikon

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 8986
  • "Everybody lies." --House
« Reply #14 on: <04-19-13/1509:27> »
In 'On the Run', people with the "I do the job, I get paid, I go home" mindset will never see most of the adventure, unless some heavy railroading goes on from the DM. The kind of paranoia you need to check into a job when things smell fishy is learned over time. You want to do 'On the Run' after the players have had a Johnson or two screw them over, and they've started learning why you need to check into the 'why' of the job. And it isn't just the players. I'll admit I've played through 'On the Run' before. But my character was new to the shadows, and didn't really know how things worked. So my character didn't question the job. He just did it and got paid, because there weren't any characters who suggested that maybe they should check into this job a bit more.
Greataxe - Apply directly to source of problem, repeat as needed.

My Characters