It's not about getting it, or trying to rationalize ways to get around it.
It's about presenting a game balance mechanic to stop rampant cracked programs from being the norm. Quite frankly, the SOTA works rather well if you actually play with it. It basically works out to be a monthly line item you tack onto your lifestyle costs. It gives you the option to crack software when you really do need multiple copies for a short time... but there's a reasonable cost associated with it.
Stop and think about it from another angle... what happens if EVERYONE does it... corps, consumers, runners... everyone.
How is there ANY market whatsoever for any software if it's just going to be stolen and copied....
Its just like the modern day equivalent. The issue here is that if you are a business and the developer look into you and realizes you don't have an actual license, but are using their software, you're in a lot of trouble. It isn't uncommon to see a non-professional's computer loaded down with software, none of which is legal though.
Falconer, Crash pretty much has it dead straight.
The only thing stopping modern businesses from pirating everything they want is head-count (or is that chair-count?) audits by their vendors, whistle-blower rewards, and all that jazz, not the fact that (except for possibly AV software) the software goes kaput in a few months. Oh, yes, and because of basic human morality. Most people will pay for the software because they want to support the creator of the product so they can keep making more. Either that or, deep down, they know stealing is wrong and the little policeman in their had is giving them dirty looks when they think about it.
The average home-user that's not subject to such audits can pirate with impunity as long as they take a few minor precautions. Given that the average Hacker with a high-end Commlink is already likely neck-deep in enough Restricted and Forbidden hardware to get them severely locked up, I severely doubt they'd worry about some Forbidden software. I also severely doubt most of them (not all, of course... there's always exceptions) would give as much of a fuck about Intellectual Property rights as the average college student with a Hard Drive full of illegal music.
Totally "unbalanced" from a system perspective, yes, but that's the way the real world works. Life isn't balanced, life isn't fair, and those who are willing to lie, cheat, and steal will always,
always get an edge over those who aren't. It just so happens that, when it comes to digital information, that edge is
huge.
------------------------------------
Also, most of the stuff is put put there by people who do it as a hobby, just for the challenge of it, and release they cracked programs as proof of their success. That, or the programs are leaked by disgruntled employees from the company itself out to screw their bosses. In either situation, the idea of them charging
anything for the pirated software is just absurd. Not only is money not their motivation, but a money trail leading back to them makes it easier to get caught and strung up by the neck.