51
Errata / Re: [SR6] Sixth World Core Book Errata File
« Last post by KarmaInferno on <08-05-23/0609:44> »[pg 272] Linguasofts - "Language Expert" is repeated twice for both Rating 3 and Rating 4.
Recent Posts
[pg 272] Linguasofts - "Language Expert" is repeated twice for both Rating 3 and Rating 4.
52
Errata / Re: [SR6] Body Shop errata
« Last post by KarmaInferno on <08-05-23/0546:18> »[pg 42] Skillsoft Subscriptions - no mention is made for if Linguasofts are included.
53
Errata / Re: [SR6] Body Shop errata
« Last post by KarmaInferno on <08-04-23/1419:27> »Kind of a general request for table formatting going forward:
If a piece of 'ware is meant to be available for Essence or Capacity but has a relevant "zero" Essence or Capacity cost, can it be denoted on tables with an actual number "0" be used instead of "—"?
There are a number of cases where "—" is used to denote "0 cost", such as with Casemodding. There are other cases where "—" is used to indicate "not available for that cost category" meaning it's ONLY for Essence or Capacity use and not the other.
Like, Auto-injectors (p 43) have a minimal Essence cost and a Capacity cost of "—", which could reasonably interpreted either way, as available as a cyberlimb accessory for zero Capacity, or not available as a Cyberware accessory at all.
If a piece of 'ware is meant to be available for Essence or Capacity but has a relevant "zero" Essence or Capacity cost, can it be denoted on tables with an actual number "0" be used instead of "—"?
There are a number of cases where "—" is used to denote "0 cost", such as with Casemodding. There are other cases where "—" is used to indicate "not available for that cost category" meaning it's ONLY for Essence or Capacity use and not the other.
Like, Auto-injectors (p 43) have a minimal Essence cost and a Capacity cost of "—", which could reasonably interpreted either way, as available as a cyberlimb accessory for zero Capacity, or not available as a Cyberware accessory at all.
54
General Gaming / Re: Shadowrun: Takedown Boardgame
« Last post by tequila on <08-04-23/0757:33> »Mine, too. When I posted this I told myself I wasn't going to back it. By 2pm I'd backed it and added dice, the coin, and Sprawl Ops since I don't have that. WTF is wrong with me? 
55
General Gaming / Re: Shadowrun: Takedown Boardgame
« Last post by Michael Chandra on <08-03-23/1651:39> »My wallet hates me.
56
General Gaming / Shadowrun: Takedown Boardgame
« Last post by tequila on <08-03-23/1232:22> »Not sure if anyone else saw this or not. Already funded.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/cgl/shadowrun-take-down
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/cgl/shadowrun-take-down
57
Errata / Re: [SR6] Body Shop errata
« Last post by KarmaInferno on <08-02-23/1211:37> »In both of these cases, the rules are in the description of the augment. The asterisk in the table says "see text".
Sorry, in the second one for cybereyes I cut and pasted when i should not have. Corrected.
The first stands, however, Neither the table nor the description tells us how to determine Availability, only nuyen and essence costs.
Actually, re-reading it, I am wondering if the chart is in error. The "3" Capacity should be a "3" Availability, with the Capacity being "-" as this does not feel like an augmentation meant to be installed in cyberlimbs.
58
Rules and such / Re: Help me tow a boat
« Last post by Greysword on <08-01-23/1338:20> »Awesome, thanks! That matches real life, too.
59
Errata / Re: Sixth World Companion errata
« Last post by MercilessMing on <08-01-23/0830:00> »Skin modification qualities are missing incompatibility text, unless players are supposed to be allowed to combine rhino skin + granite skin + dragon scales + tree bark + blubber
60
Errata / Re: [SR6] Body Shop errata
« Last post by MercilessMing on <08-01-23/0824:00> »In both of these cases, the rules are in the description of the augment. The asterisk in the table says "see text".
