Shadowrun

Shadowrun General => Gear => Topic started by: Emil_Barr on <11-12-11/1358:38>

Title: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Emil_Barr on <11-12-11/1358:38>
I'm a new member here, and I thought I'd say "hi" by starting up a new topic on something that's bugged me for a bit, and maybe get a fresh perspective on it. Forgive me if I'm putting emphasis on something that everyone else thinks is obvious :)

Regarding the titular question, I sometimes feel that it can be very true. This isn't the case for items that are obvious to any observer, such as a firearm. Licenses for those pretty much are mandatory if you don't want constant problems with the law. However, for non obvious gear, different combinations of gear do seem to make me think taking licenses for them are pointless. Take for instance, the following case:

Quote
Obvious Cyber Arm
Strength Mod X
Spur

Now, I'm making two assumptions here. My first assumption is that the Strength Mod on the arm is a modification to the internal workings of the cyber arm, and is not obviously noticeable without special equipment (i.e. a cyberware scanner) The second assumption I'm making is similar, but in regards to the Spur. Because Spurs are retractable, I assume that when retracted they are unnoticeable. I figure this is the case because RAW lists no threshold to detect retracted Spurs, though I do realize that this could also mean that they are in fact obvious and not really hidden at all. The first interpretation just seems to make more sense to me, but I will admit it's highly possible I'm wrong.

Now, assuming I'm correct, MAD Scanners arn't that big a deal, because they'll just detect the cyberarm and not the equipment within. Easy to play off and no licenses is need for either in this situation. As I'm sure we're all aware however, Cyberware Scanners are another case entirely, because they see through objects and can pick individual equipment in the arm. So, the character gets scanned, and the scanner gets it's hit and detects the arm, the Mod, and the Spur. Here's where my question starts to come into play. The Strength Mod is restricted gear, so one's first instinct is to buy up a fake license to make it nice and legal. However, the same scan will pick up the Spur, which is forbidden equipment. So you're going to have issues no matter what. So it would seem to me that one ought to just save yourself the [100 x rating Nuyen] on the license, cause it doesn't seem to matter.

Now, you might say, "Big deal, at char gen that like what, 400 Nuyen saved?" Well, that's just for the arm. There's still the rest of the runner to consider!

Quote
Runny McRunsalot

Eyeware
Cybereyes 1

Cybereyes
Smartlink

Bodyware
Plastic Bone Lacing
Wired Reflexes 1
Dermal Plating 1
Reaction Enhancers 1
Muscle Replacement 1

Obvious Cyber Arm
Strength Mod X

Now, you'll notice that I removed the Spur from the character, and you may be wondering, "why?" Well, it's because I'm open to the idea that a Spur is in fact obvious to an observer. So I've replaced it with a piece of equipment that I think we all can agree is not obvious, but is forbidden just the same (Plastic Bone Lacing) The rest of the gear is either restricted or perfectly legal.

Now, the character goes through a MAD Scanner. It'll go off, but again this isn't necessarily a big deal. Almost all of the gear cant be seen with the naked eye, and the cyberarm can be played as the source. Hell, the Bone Lacing cant even be detected by MAD because it's plastic. But again, a Cyberware Scanner will pick it all up. Since you have a piece of forbidden gear, having licenses for everything else would seem to be pointless. Now we're up to 2400 Nuyen. That's somewhat significant at Char Gen, at lest it is to a skinflint like me! I mean, c'mon that's like, 240 doses of Novacoke! Could throw a hell of a party with that! And there's a hidden bonus as well. You're SIN doesn't need to have a background explaining why you have all this murder gear installed in you! ;)

Am I wrong in my thinking? What do you all think?

Now, I will say one more thing, when I talk about MAD Scanners, I'm assuming a walk though scanner. Because MAD Scanners can be wands too, the character would want to have at least one license, probably for the Dermal Plating, to explain why their calves are setting off the scanner. :P
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Xzylvador on <11-12-11/1416:10>
You might want to look up the millimeter-wave aka cyberware scanner on SR4A 262 and 334.
It'll see that metal weapon right through that metal arm. (Actually I think a MAD scanner would too. It isn't just a "metal has been detected in close proximity" scanner, it could give a nice 3D render of your metallic arm and the weapon that's "hidden" inside unless it had magnetic shielding, which would be suspicious too.)
But the cyberware scanner would also see that same weapon if it was plastic, or wood or anything else and it can see that plastic that's been put in/on your bones.

So either get a good fake licence & non-forbidden gear, get bioware (and hope there isn't an assensing wagemage doing security) or make sure your hacker tells that scanner that everything is a-ok.

Edit: Would just like to add that my 'runners don't usually have licences for all their restricted gear and will keep some of it hidden just as well as their forbidden gear. There are some things with an R-rating which will get you into trouble regardless of the fact if you have a licence for it or not.
Getting caught with an AK-97, 2 Uzi's, a bunch of flashbang, smoke and gas grenades, a lockpick set, grapple gun and a map of the nearby prison will get you in trouble, no matter what licence you have in your pockets.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Emil_Barr on <11-12-11/1440:42>
You might want to look up the millimeter-wave aka cyberware scanner on SR4A 262 and 334.
It'll see that metal weapon right through that metal arm.

Oh, I'm aware of it. That's why I mentioned it. ;)

That's why I say that if you have both forbidden and restricted gear, getting licenses for your restricted gear seems rather pointless to me. Of course, the obvious solution would be to not get any forbidden gear, but what fun is that? ;D

(Actually I think a MAD scanner would too. It isn't just a "metal has been detected in close proximity" scanner, it could give a nice 3D render of your metallic arm and the weapon that's "hidden" inside unless it had magnetic shielding, which would be suspicious too.)

I haven't read anything that would give me that impression, just that it was a metal detector. I suppose it could work like some sort of X-Ray scanner, but that always seemed more like the territory of a Cyberware Scanner to me, since it specifically mentions that it sees through things. 
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Xzylvador on <11-12-11/1617:28>
It can go both ways with a MAD scanner I guess. SR4A states that it finds metallic substances with the purpose of finding concealed weapons, and then explains how to determine if it finds a weapon/object.

That can be read as a the normal magnetic scanner you now have in airports (and apparently schools in the US): "When metal passes: roll dice and it might beep". In which case it probably wouldn't find the metal blade in the metal arm.
But it can also be interpreted by reading it as: "It finds all metal. Roll dice to determine if it can make a good enough image of the object to recognize it and beep if it's a weapon." In 2070+, I'm going with the second. *shrug*
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: beowulf_of_wa on <11-12-11/1638:11>
see the real trick is having it but not needing to take it thru the scanner.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Xzylvador on <11-12-11/1731:46>
FedEx your cyberarms and -legs to the location and step on a plane without?
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: KarmaInferno on <11-13-11/0042:13>
This is why modular cyberlimbs might be useful to a runner.

:)


-k
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Crash_00 on <11-13-11/0225:01>
Licenses really depend on the character for me. Some of my characters I play very professional and some of them could give a damn because if they get flagged they've already botched it.

That said, think about all the random crap you see today. I mean seriously think about it, there are more stupid trends around today than ever and its only getting worse. By 2070 its got to have hit an all time low. Take a few points of Con and slap an RFID on the spurt labeling it a "Office Master Commemorative Letter Opener" Yeah I got that after five years at the corp. Seems silly now, but the boss footed the bill. If you want to go all out, actually get a Letter Opener spur and swap them out when you aren't on the job. Or hell, take off the spur and slap in a pez dispenser.

My most illegal character hasn't ever had a license. He started fairly simple with barely anything to his name (I think a pistols that he didn't have any skill in was his only real restricted gear). Now he runs in Ruthenium coated Heavy Military Armor with a coated battle rifle of doom.

The real trick with licenses is that most of them (guns especially) will become useless after a run in which they are used unless you are careful enough to not leave any evidence behind (digging out rounds, etc.).
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Joush on <11-16-11/0509:18>
Guns don't tag their ammo with an RFID, for forensics to link your weapon to the rounds it fired, they need to confiscate the weapon and compare the marks it leaves on ammunition to the rounds left on the scene. (Keep in mind with SR, they can't link tool marks on shell cases in most.. uh.. cases. Because they are caseless.)

In my game the exact options installed in cybernetics are hard to pick out with  a Cybertechnology check required to pick them out with a cyberware scanner with a threshold of 2 plus the grade of the limb (3 for alpha, 4 for beta, ect.).  It's hard to tell at a glance if someone has a spur hidden along or within their synthetic ulna or smartlink installed within their cybereyes.

You can drop licenses if your basic loadout is blatantly illegal however. If you aren't going to get though a casual security inspection without Forbidden items being noticed, you don't need to bother getting a license for your pistol, ammo, smartlink and comlink software.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: kirk on <11-16-11/0726:27>
Guns don't tag their ammo with an RFID, for forensics to link your weapon to the rounds it fired, they need to confiscate the weapon and compare the marks it leaves on ammunition to the rounds left on the scene. (Keep in mind with SR, they can't link tool marks on shell cases in most.. uh.. cases. Because they are caseless.) [snip]

Based on the general text (RFID everywhere) and on the way the taggants are developing today, It's possible your gun will tag the ammo's RFID. That's probably a little too paranoid even for shadowrun, but it's worth considering.

Note the phrasing, by the way. I didn't say tag with RFID. The gun would send a message to RFIDs already in the bullet and powder: "Your ride today is courtesy of Jonesy's Predator, serial number 5520088515, registered owner..."

More likely is that the bullet will tag your gun with RFID. I figure that the manufacturing process will leave RFIDs in every bullet and mixed with the powder. A lot of the powder-based RFIDs will be destroyed from the heat and pressure. "A lot" isn't "all". In this case the link isn't as tight. It's just that forensics can read the RFIDs and know the manufacturer and lot number of those bullets. With that they'll be able to trace to all the sales and add the purchasers to their list of suspects.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: inca1980 on <11-16-11/0751:15>
One thing to consider too though is the actual punishment once you get caught.  Granted, just one year-long sentence in practical game terms is just as bad as a 2 year long sentence, but potentially the amount of punishment could be worse for each restricted item you don't have a liscence for.  Alternately , the amount of bribe money you might have to pay for having a license might be significantly reduced if your GM pays that much attention to detail. 

Personally, as a GM if I saw a character actually went and bought some licenses i'd roll some dice and that could help out their situation, or lessen the bribe money needed to be paid to get out of said situation.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Zilfer on <11-16-11/1418:24>
So I had a question, can you put a Cyberware Scanner or MAD Scanner on Glasses? Or goggles? Just curious.... if so I would think it might be a bit useful. XD Maybe i'm over shooting here... XD

I was able to do it in chummer but i don't know if it's legitament.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Xzylvador on <11-16-11/1458:10>
Can only put vision enhancements in those. But don't consider that a bad thing, there's really no point in putting it in goggles!

Read the capacity sensors use and the sensor packages & capacity table on SR4A p334.
One of the most (over?-)powerful sensors for a runner is the Ultrawideband Radar on AR59 if you ask me. It's basically a cyberware scanner and radar in one. And pretty cheap too!
It takes only 2 capacity, meaning you can put it in a handheld sensor package (about the size of a pack of gum or a lighter). That handheld sensor-package can have a signal rating of 3, meaning you don't even have to hold it to see what it picks up. You can have it in your pocket, lying on a table or anywhere within 400m.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Zilfer on <11-16-11/1501:48>
Can only put vision enhancements in those. But don't consider that a bad thing, there's really no point in putting it in goggles!

Read the capacity sensors use and the sensor packages & capacity table on SR4A p334.
One of the most (over?-)powerful sensors for a runner is the Ultrawideband Radar on AR59 if you ask me. It's basically a cyberware scanner and radar in one. And pretty cheap too!
It takes only 2 capacity, meaning you can put it in a handheld sensor package (about the size of a pack of gum or a lighter). That handheld sensor-package can have a signal rating of 3, meaning you don't even have to hold it to see what it picks up. You can have it in your pocket, lying on a table or anywhere within 400m.

I'll definately take a look.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Joush on <11-16-11/1858:29>
Guns don't tag their ammo with an RFID, for forensics to link your weapon to the rounds it fired, they need to confiscate the weapon and compare the marks it leaves on ammunition to the rounds left on the scene. (Keep in mind with SR, they can't link tool marks on shell cases in most.. uh.. cases. Because they are caseless.) [snip]

Based on the general text (RFID everywhere) and on the way the taggants are developing today, It's possible your gun will tag the ammo's RFID. That's probably a little too paranoid even for shadowrun, but it's worth considering.

Note the phrasing, by the way. I didn't say tag with RFID. The gun would send a message to RFIDs already in the bullet and powder: "Your ride today is courtesy of Jonesy's Predator, serial number 5520088515, registered owner..."

More likely is that the bullet will tag your gun with RFID. I figure that the manufacturing process will leave RFIDs in every bullet and mixed with the powder. A lot of the powder-based RFIDs will be destroyed from the heat and pressure. "A lot" isn't "all". In this case the link isn't as tight. It's just that forensics can read the RFIDs and know the manufacturer and lot number of those bullets. With that they'll be able to trace to all the sales and add the purchasers to their list of suspects.

I see your logic, but it's nowhere in the rules and RFID are not free in Shadowrun. Even basic, easy to burn tags are .05 ¥, with the only tags that can resist burning being 100x more expensive. If every round of ammo has a security tag, it would represent 250% the cost of a normal round.

Given that the game already has everything need to pass though a tag burner before it's used, I'd hardly want to encourage more of that as it's not fun.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: CanRay on <11-16-11/2112:50>
Maybe one round randomly in each box of military ammo?  Enough to transmit the box and it's details at the very least, but not too much extra cost in bulk.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: KarmaInferno on <11-16-11/2350:12>
Doesn't have to be an RFID.

Modern day industrial explosives are often mixed with a tracer chemical at the factory to identify where it came from. The tracer resists burning enough that it can be picked up with forensic analysis after an explosion.

Mixing similar compounds into a bullet shouldn't be THAT much harder.



-k
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Joush on <11-17-11/0211:56>
I've never acutely heard that before, but even if it was done with ammunition it would be of minimal forensic use. The ammunition itself can generally be tracked to manufacturer and some can be tracked to lot numbers. Traditional forensic techniques can match fired rounds to the weapon that fired them. Being able to say with certainty that a particular weapon fired a partular type of ammo or even pertecular lot of ammo sense the last time it was cleaned is unlikely to be worth much more.

Not to mention that such a processes would require a law to make the job of police easier at the cost of hurting ammuntion manufacturer's bottom line. Given that the game is set in a nightmarish distopia where corporations effectively own the government, that seems somewhat unlikely.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: kirk on <11-17-11/0735:27>
Guns don't tag their ammo with an RFID, for forensics to link your weapon to the rounds it fired, they need to confiscate the weapon and compare the marks it leaves on ammunition to the rounds left on the scene. (Keep in mind with SR, they can't link tool marks on shell cases in most.. uh.. cases. Because they are caseless.) [snip]

Based on the general text (RFID everywhere) and on the way the taggants are developing today, It's possible your gun will tag the ammo's RFID. That's probably a little too paranoid even for shadowrun, but it's worth considering.

Note the phrasing, by the way. I didn't say tag with RFID. The gun would send a message to RFIDs already in the bullet and powder: "Your ride today is courtesy of Jonesy's Predator, serial number 5520088515, registered owner..."

More likely is that the bullet will tag your gun with RFID. I figure that the manufacturing process will leave RFIDs in every bullet and mixed with the powder. A lot of the powder-based RFIDs will be destroyed from the heat and pressure. "A lot" isn't "all". In this case the link isn't as tight. It's just that forensics can read the RFIDs and know the manufacturer and lot number of those bullets. With that they'll be able to trace to all the sales and add the purchasers to their list of suspects.

I see your logic, but it's nowhere in the rules and RFID are not free in Shadowrun. Even basic, easy to burn tags are .05 ¥, with the only tags that can resist burning being 100x more expensive. If every round of ammo has a security tag, it would represent 250% the cost of a normal round.

Given that the game already has everything need to pass though a tag burner before it's used, I'd hardly want to encourage more of that as it's not fun.
About no fun, true and I agree.

About the cost, not so much. Oh, yes, if you purchase your own to emplace them, sure. But purchased in bulk for a standardized purpose?

See nanofax feedstock.

(edit to add) The point I'd actually make is that it's already there, not a new cost that's going to show up. And it goes part of the way to explaining why shadowrun bullets are so expensive.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Xzylvador on <11-17-11/0910:14>
Still, no mention in RAW and no fun at all.
If you want to look at modern-day top-of-the-line forensics and other crime-fighting techniques and then go on to calculate how much more advanced things will be by 2070, committing a crime without being caught simply becomes impossible and all the fun gets sucked out of the game as 90% of it will be theoretical work on how to clean the crime scene and get into 13.835 different nodes which may or may not have a recording of the crime being committed.

So use the fact that 'police' doesn't exist anymore but instead there are a dozen different security companies, hired by the city, the country, the building, the neighborhood, etc; all trying to make each other look bad so they have a better chance of landing the contract when the time comes for renegotiation and that companies don't like sharing information about their clients.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: DarkLloyd on <11-18-11/1333:43>
Okay. MAD scanners are just metal detectors, maybe a bit fancier in the futre but still. These can be fooled by ceramic parts or MAD dampening materials. As long as that cyber arm is not an obvious job, those methods might get you past a "stop-n-check".  Going thru the Airport, well thats not gonna happen without allot of prep, but it can happen.

Now as for that Radar sensor. It has the biggest vulerabilites; it's radar. And radar is vulerable to ECM and jammers. Going thru one bring a jammer. Or the old reliable have yer decker hack the feeds.
Title: Re: Can gear loadout make licenses pointless?
Post by: Reaver on <11-18-11/2323:44>
Don't forget that a license is tied to a SIN, and a SIN is a citizen of a legal, national entity.

Smartlink, wired reflexes, bone lacing?? Knight Errant SWAT member (or at least that's what the SIN says:p )

But it gets tricky that way too (and fun for the game master), after all Aztech isn't going to like a "Horizon media rep" hanging around its property much.

Now yes, some cyber/bioware simply can't be explained away with a SIN and game masters should clamp down as they see fit.

Personally, I only make an issue of it when the characters are trying to go somewhere the security is really tight.