I got a question for Fastjack....
wouldn't technically if we knew 1 person what smitting us, then we could report them for harassment? Constantly hitting someone's negative karma has to at least be grounds for a warning, and other sites if someone had so much as smited someone 20 times in a row they could have had much more consequences on their plate.
I think that would be covered under the rules somewhere.... though at this rate ARC is probably going to be the only person with over -300 karma soon. 
I understand where you're coming from, but if they are smiting you that much and you report them from harassment, then what? We ban them because they don't like you? We ban both of you because you can't get along?
Look at the freelancers that visit the boards. They take a lot of crap from posters, and all of it publicly. If we started banning people based on harassment qualities, half the folks in the clip vs. magazine threads would be tossed. As long as the person isn't bullying anyone, there's no way that we can ban them. If someone doesn't like another person on the boards, that's not harassment.
This is true. Though i thought that the "intent" to inflict massive amounts of negatives to have other's see the member in negative light. (First impression is important
sometimes it's not the words you say) Is kind of bullying.
I was seeing it in the light of "oh you don't agree with me? well i'm going to make sure everyone see's that you aren't agreeable."
But yeah, I'm not sure what exactly constitutes as bullying then, besides the obvious outright name calling/foul language.
Anyways off that subject, and onto the random tangent i saw. I've still no idea that argument between those.... <.<
*look's at the heaviest ban hammer on the matrix in Fastjack's hand...*
*takes one step away*
