...As I stated somewhere else in this thread, my interpretation (read: that's kind of like an opinion) is that the Master/Slave relationship works a lot like a proxy connection. Sorry for that last aside, I just hate when people patronize me.
If you have a problem with my suggestion, then fine. I NEVER stated that this was RAW.
As I said, I have no problem with your
suggestion.
I quoted you from page 10 just because it very much seemed as if you started to claim when you slave a device to a commlink the slaved device would vanish from the Grid and an attacker would only see the commlink... that he had to breach the firewall of the commlink "node" before he could target the other devices in the PAN. I got the impression that you claimed that SR5 RAW said it worked like this.
My stance is that "It did in SR4, but it doesn't in SR5".
If i miss-read what you typed and your intention never was to claim that it worked like that by RAW then I have no issue at all.
- In fact, in that case I probably owe you an apology
