Shadowrun

Shadowrun General => Gear => Topic started by: Anarkitty on <07-02-13/1440:11>

Title: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Anarkitty on <07-02-13/1440:11>
Meet the Anzio Ironworks Ultra Long Range Sniper System...
(http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/images-20mm022standingatangle-fp.jpg) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anzio_20mm_rifle)
(Picture from The Firearm Blog (http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/09/anzio-20mm-vulcan-rifle-cannon/), used without permission)

2 meters long and weighing in at nearly 60 kilograms, it has a 5000 meter maximum effective range and fires 20mm Vulcan rounds from a detachable box magazi...um...clip.  It sits somewhere between an assault cannon and a sniper rifle.

Here's my first stab at statting it out, primarily because I want to buy one for my Gnome Sniper:

Sniper Rifle   
Damage
  AP 
Mode
RC
Ammo
Availability
Cost
Anzio 20mm
10P
-5
SS
1
3(c)*
20F**
11,500¥
* The Anzio 20mm uses Assault Cannon ammunition.
** Despite the Anzio's range and power, it is marketed and sold primarily as a civilian sport and hunting rifle. Some jurisdictions classify it as legality 'R' at the GM's discretion.

It comes equipped with a bipod, and a shock pad.  The only barrel accessories that can be mounted on the Anzio are a specialized flare/sound suppressor for 3200¥ or a muzzle brake for 1800¥ which provides 2 points of recoil compensation.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: 5-0 Deuce on <07-02-13/1507:54>
That damn gun is almost 3 times the size of that gnome...lol. Do what you do.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Mäx on <07-02-13/1528:05>
I would say that in SR terms that is an assault cannon, only reason their calling it a sniper rifle is that the term assault cannon doesn't exist IRL and they don't exactly want to call their civilian weapon an anti tank rifle.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: CanRay on <07-02-13/1554:57>
That damn gun is almost 3 times the size of that gnome...lol. Do what you do.
I shall now make a Gnome NPC named "Bipod".  :P
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Basic on <07-02-13/1742:14>
OMG I want it.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: 5-0 Deuce on <07-02-13/1851:08>
 :D Fun. Bipod could double as your spotter / additional ammo bearer.

See...I guess its classification depends on the round type...If its usual round is meant for a pin point target such as a Barrett, I'll call it a sniper rifle. If its meant for an area target like a Mk-19, then I'd say assault cannon. I suppose you can just call yourself a vehicle sniper.  :P

The over pressure from that must be enormous.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Anarkitty on <07-03-13/1117:51>
I believe an accurate description is "Anti-material Sniper Rifle".  "Vehicle Sniper" is pretty good too.
In SR terms, it is somewhere between an Assault Cannon and a Sniper Rifle. 
A "Sniper Cannon", maybe?

And keep in mind, it is still lethal against soft targets, It's just overkill.  Against a walking-tank Troll in Mil-Spec armor, it is barely overkill.

Also, the grip, stock, trigger and such (the "user interface") of this gun are designed to be very similar to the AR-15 so it doesn't require any special training.  It should still use the Longarms skill.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Tzeentch on <07-04-13/0449:20>
Weapons like this have been around since World War II (e.g. the Finnish L-39). Assault cannons in Shadowrun 'feel' more like payload rifles than anti-material rifles, and this seems more like the Barrett Model 121 (Arsenal, p. 28).

If you want to "build" a Shadowrun anti-material rifle, I recommend changing any sniper rifles stats by: +2 Damage, -1 AP Mod, and x2 cost just as if was firing High-Power Rounds (War!,  p. 156). with High-Power Chambering (War!, p. 156). Maybe crank up the stats a bit more and drop the Ammo to 3 or 5 to season to taste.

Strictly by canon you would probably be using Anti-Tank Rounds (War!, p. 156).

(I'm personally ambivalent at best to most of the War! stuff,, but it keeps things simple to reference it until something better comes along.)
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Lysanderz on <07-04-13/0924:54>
I'll approach this from gameplay:

Those stats are a tad low for 5th. So were I you, I would look in that direction.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Michael Chandra on <07-04-13/1046:08>
Its stats currently are SR4. SR5 is probably easy: Make it 16P damage.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: FuelDrop on <07-06-13/2100:10>
meh, the original is still the best:
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Boys_anti-tank_rifle.JPG)
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: CanRay on <07-07-13/2112:14>
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooo!  Boys Anti-Tank Rifle!  ;D
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: FuelDrop on <07-07-13/2206:19>
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooo!  Boys Anti-Tank Rifle!  ;D
Yup. Well spotted.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Anarkitty on <07-08-13/1711:07>
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooo!  Boys Anti-Tank Rifle!  ;D
Yup. Well spotted.

Psssst...It's in the image file name... 8)
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: CanRay on <07-08-13/1939:58>
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooo!  Boys Anti-Tank Rifle!  ;D
Yup. Well spotted.
Psssst...It's in the image file name... 8)
Psst, I didn't need a hint.  ;D
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Anarkitty on <07-09-13/1411:32>
I did  :P

It's pretty, though.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: CanRay on <07-09-13/1819:52>
Too bad one of the major complaints about it was broken collarbones.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Anarkitty on <07-09-13/1841:05>
I believe it.  That's probably why the Anzio has a muzzle brake that appears to be roughly the size of a toaster.
Although if you watch the videos of it being fired, the guys still moves back about a foot every time he pulls the trigger...
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: CanRay on <07-09-13/2148:16>
There's a lot of Anti-Tank Rifles from that era, which would eventually become Anti-Material Rifles of modern day.  The US, however, was smart...  "Why use a bolt-action rifle when we can just put it into a machine gun?"  ;D
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Anarkitty on <07-12-13/1628:30>
There's a lot of Anti-Tank Rifles from that era, which would eventually become Anti-Material Rifles of modern day.  The US, however, was smart...  "Why use a bolt-action rifle when we can just put it into a machine gun?"  ;D

I observe with no small amount of national pride that this is a very American sentiment.

"Well, we've made a man-portable gun that can shoot basketball-sized holes in an armored vehicle.  What now?"

"MORE DAKKA!!!!!!"
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Mäx on <07-12-13/1635:15>
There's a lot of Anti-Tank Rifles from that era, which would eventually become Anti-Material Rifles of modern day.  The US, however, was smart...  "Why use a bolt-action rifle when we can just put it into a machine gun?"  ;D

I observe with no small amount of national pride that this is a very American sentiment.

"Well, we've made a man-portable gun that can shoot basketball-sized holes in an armored vehicle.  What now?"

"MORE DAKKA!!!!!!"
UMM, fifty cal machine gun isn't man portable out side of GI Joe.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: PeterSmith on <07-12-13/1711:12>
UMM, fifty cal machine gun isn't man portable out side of GI Joe.

The United States Marine Corps would like to have a word with you about this.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: CanRay on <07-12-13/1753:07>
UMM, fifty cal machine gun isn't man portable out side of GI Joe.
The United States Marine Corps would like to have a word with you about this.
Trolls would like to have a word with you about this.  ;D
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Tzeentch on <07-12-13/1826:55>
The United States Marine Corps would like to have a word with you about this.
Citation needed.

(If you're thinking of the M82 or M107 it's not a machinegun  8) .)
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: PeterSmith on <07-12-13/2029:09>
http://www.marines.com/operating-forces/equipment/weapons/50-cal-machine-gun

Note the entry about the M3 tripod. The MOS is 0331, the breakdown is (IIRC) one man gets the receiver, one man gets the barrels, and one man gets the tripod.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Tzeentch on <07-12-13/2324:25>
Ah. I thought you were implying that Marines lug them around like assault cannons :)
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: FuelDrop on <07-12-13/2352:31>
Ah. I thought you were implying that Marines lug them around like assault cannons :)
I thought they did! :P
I heard some rumors about power armor that would let people do that, but as far as I know it's still in prototype and they were having problems powering it.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: PeterSmith on <07-13-13/0042:06>
Ah. I thought you were implying that Marines lug them around like assault cannons

No sir. The part of the statement I wanted to refute was about being man-portable. Nothing more, nothing less.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Mäx on <07-13-13/0536:01>
UMM, fifty cal machine gun isn't man portable out side of GI Joe.

The United States Marine Corps would like to have a word with you about this.
The bit about GI Joe should have been quite obvious hint that i used "man portable" in the sense that one man carries and shoots the gun by himself.

Obviously anything that can be broken down to pieces small enought   for a single man to carry is man portable in general sense.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Tzeentch on <07-13-13/1451:53>
I heard some rumors about power armor that would let people do that, but as far as I know it's still in prototype and they were having problems powering it.
You're probably thinking of the HULC lower body exoskeleton. One idea was to install a pintle mount to the frame that could hold a heavy weapon but I suspect that's just a "yeah, you could do it ... BUT ..." And the problem isn't powering it per se. It's keeping it powered in the field for 8-24 hours without everyone needing to carry so many batteries that you cancel the load carriage provided by the exoskeleton.

As Shadowrun doesn't really deal with equipment weight, such items are a bit of an edge case, mechanically. Such a mount would count as a mobile tripod (SR5, p. 433) and it would have its own carrying capacity (SR5, p. 420) and hmm.. That's about it.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Anarkitty on <07-15-13/1621:48>
And for the record, I was saying it was man-portable before they added the additional DAKKA.  My statement didn't address the man-portability of the weapon after the DAKKA was added.
That said, the ensuing discussion was entertaining and informative.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Nal0n on <07-21-13/1304:13>
Bah, we got the 207x's now anyways (depending on SR4 or 5) ... cal .50 is for ppl that cannot afford/source decent Lasers and Gauss Rifles :p
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Angrypixels on <07-29-13/0738:40>
Don't rule out standard bullets too quickly, they still have their place especially if someone is looking to avoid the flashiness of an energy discharge.
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Nal0n on <07-29-13/1321:16>
Don't rule out standard bullets too quickly, they still have their place especially if someone is looking to avoid the flashiness of an energy discharge.

The flashiness is pure BONUS ... and do not stare at my rainbow-mohawk too hard ;)

Apart from that you are totally right that a Sniper should do all things possible not to be seen.
So if the "Rule-of-Cool™" does not work with your GM you should choose a "less-flashy" option ;)

Nonetheless: The Thunderstruck is just sooo cool ... one day one of my chars will have one (if only for range shooting) ... even if I have to wait for Shadowrun 14 :p
Title: Re: If the Barrett 121 isn't bad enough for you...
Post by: Mäx on <07-29-13/1447:04>
Yeah thunderstruck is the uncontested king of sniping weapons.
But laser on the other hand utterly suck for sniping, their strickly CQC weapons.