Shadowrun
Shadowrun Play => Character creation and critique => Topic started by: Bushw4cker on <02-07-14/1339:41>
-
I was having fun with my Character Theme.
Street Barbarian.
He doesn't even Work Out!
-
The Enhanced Accuracy for Blades should also be figured into the combat knight's Accuracy too.
-
Again with the half-breeds. These don't exist in Shadowrun. This is either an Ork Poser or a Human-Looking Ork.
-
Again with the half-breeds. These don't exist in Shadowrun. This is either an Ork Poser or a Human-Looking Ork.
It's mentioned in the sheet the Half-Ork is actually just a Human-Looking Ork.
-
The Enhanced Accuracy for Blades should also be figured into the combat knight's Accuracy too.
Hard to get anything past you! You don't miss a thing.
-
Again with the half-breeds. These don't exist in Shadowrun. This is either an Ork Poser or a Human-Looking Ork.
I know that.
I wanted to make Giant Human, but they didn't have those, so I made Giant Ork (Human Looking)
If you were an eight foot tall Human built like a Tank wouldn't you wonder if you were maybe part Ork?..
For Few characters I've made, I take poser Flaw, but do it a little different. Like one character thinks because He is so good looking he must be part elf, and insists he has some Elf blood.
-
In the sheet it's listed, sure. But in the title of the thread it says "Half-Ork Barbarian". Since Half-Ork isn't a thing, it's a little misleading. I'm just suggesting that Bush keeps his archetype titles in-world.
-
SR doesn't have barbarians either. It's an obvious reference to D&D. Let's calm down and learn to take a joke.
-
SR doesn't have barbarians either. It's an obvious reference to D&D. Let's calm down and learn to take a joke.
A) please don't pretend to know me.
B) I understand a joke.
C) when the archetypes that don't really fall into Shadowrun numbered more than 6... it kind of stopped being a joke.
-
You start with 4 points of notoriety not 3 (add 1 for criminal sin).
-
Having a "half-ork barbarian" in Shadowrun isn't much of a joke. Me (as GM) making a grizzly bear barbarian for a D&D4 campaign and naming it a "barbearian" is a way better one. Heck, even me making a Gnome Barbarian in a Pathfinder campaign because we don't have to optimize to keep up is a better one.
-
Ok so i don't know the OP or any of the posters. I wasn't trying to single anyone out, if it seems that way i apologize for that. All i was saying is it seems to me the OP isn't trying to make a serious character and was trying to ahare something lighthearted. If it is that then we should take it that way.
And i would like to point out the concept of a running gag, the more d&d references he, the OP, puts in a character on a shadowrun forum, the more it should be taken as a joke. Just my 2 ¥. Now if i'm totally off base i'll just go ahead and apologize now.
-
Jesus who cares what he names the archetypes. This is a level of pedantry that sincerely amazes me.