How much respect do you have for Dunkelzahn? Do you think that the fallout from his will was intentional or accidental? Do you believe that he had other plans in place to make sure the end result happened? Like I said, how much respect do you have for him?
I smell a set-up. But to answer your questions: generally intentional, because everything that happened is fallout, and not all of it was bad; one can make the argument that the majority of the fallout was
good, or at least progressive as compared to regressive. Had he lived, he would have made sure that things kept moving in the direction he wanted; death 'merely' forced him to speed up the events by sudden disbursements, revelations, etc. In regards to your question about 'respect', quite a bit - but 'respect' does not automatically mean 'like', or even 'work for'. But your question reminds me of a conversation in a fantastic movie, 'Grand Canyon', with Danny Glover and Kevin Kline in it:
Rocstar: I'm gonna grant you that favor, and I'm gonna expect you to remember it if we ever meet again. But tell me this, are you asking me as a sign of respect, or are you asking because I've got the gun?
Simon: Man, the world ain't supposed to work like this. I mean, maybe you don't know that yet. I'm supposed to be able to do my job without having to ask you if I can. That dude is supposed to be able to wait with his car without you ripping him off. Everything is supposed to be different than it is.
Rocstar: So what's your answer?
Simon: You ain't got the gun, we ain't having this conversation.
Rocstar: That's what I thought: no gun, no respect. That's why I always got the gun.
Rocstar (functionally 'random punk #1'), you see, doesn't understand that he's not the one getting the respect; the gun is. He also doesn't understand that if he didn't have the gun, he wouldn't trying to be ripping off 'that dude' who's waiting with his car; he'd be trying to actually do something with himself.
"Yeah, fine, Wyrm, but how does this apply to the 'respect Dunkelzahn' question?" He's a Great Dragon; love him or hate him, you have to respect the gun.
Getting into the underlying question - the one that CitJoe is trying to pounce with - no, I don't think Dunkelzahn was a jerk. I think he had a plan, thirty or three-hundred years long, and that his pieces were moving into place slowly, subtly, and with a minimum of negative impact. I think that he kept in mind the fact that he just MIGHT kick the bucket, and so he had that thirty/three-hundred-year plan boiled down into a bunch of large, indiscrete, relatively clumsy moves that nonetheless got a lot of what he wanted done - or at least things moving in the direction that he felt the world needed to move. The problem with it, of course, is that the gross movements represented in the will DID cause a lot of collateral damage, as well as getting done a lot of the things he wanted done.
So again, sorry, CitJoe - your two pet theories really have neither proof nor sufficient traction to be canonical, or even to come out of any canonical character's mouth besides Plan 9's.