Srry for this, well we have a say here, that would translate to something like:
Sourcebook: Shit a brick!
True believers: Look! A Brick. And it is made of gold. Ummm. And so tasty...
This discussion is full of demagogy and IMO lack ability to admit there are some mistakes. Such things happen. The book is good. Slightly above the average but not really bad. Almost useless IMO for GM so its mainly the source of fluff to add a flavour to the campaign, and as such, it works. There are flaws, well it is nothing even close to WAR! so I can live with that. Since the situation looks like gets resolved later in 5th ed, I am about to forget the foreplay as it never happened, and focus on the bigger picture.
IMO its time to move forwad for everyone, since we are beating the same dead horse for the 5th time in this thread. That Java applet is realy good. If it was used in the research phase, we may never had this conversation IMO.
Lessons learned.
Case closed.
At least for me.