Kind of a general request for table formatting going forward:
If a piece of 'ware is meant to be available for Essence or Capacity but has a relevant "zero" Essence or Capacity cost, can it be denoted on tables with an actual number "0" be used instead of "—"?
There are a number of cases where "—" is used to denote "0 cost", such as with Casemodding. There are other cases where "—" is used to indicate "not available for that cost category" meaning it's ONLY for Essence or Capacity use and not the other.
Like, Auto-injectors (p 43) have a minimal Essence cost and a Capacity cost of "—", which could reasonably interpreted either way, as available as a cyberlimb accessory for zero Capacity, or not available as a Cyberware accessory at all.