[Pathica]

Shouldn't we be able to see what of our comments in the forum got applauded and which got smitten, but obviously not by whom?

I'unno, I get curious sometimes.

I know the Bulletin forum software has the option to see which post were 'liked', with-or-without seeing who did it. Though vBulletin  has options for everything!

Well, I never really liked the Reputation System neither the one in the BBB nor the one from here

I've never really been a fan of them either (though I am delicate... lacking the requisite skin thickness needed for the interwebs. ) Perhaps using the 'net total' could be done, so there is no '-' listing.

Ideally they should make it mirror Jackpoint, use a percentage based system. e.g.: 70% positive.

(And thanks to the 3 folks who pushed my button! lol)

[FastJack]

Shouldn't we be able to see what of our comments in the forum got applauded and which got smitten, but obviously not by whom?

I'unno, I get curious sometimes.

I know the Bulletin forum software has the option to see which post were 'liked', with-or-without seeing who did it. Though vBulletin  has options for everything!

Well, I never really liked the Reputation System neither the one in the BBB nor the one from here

I've never really been a fan of them either (though I am delicate... lacking the requisite skin thickness needed for the interwebs. ) Perhaps using the 'net total' could be done, so there is no '-' listing.

Ideally they should make it mirror Jackpoint, use a percentage based system. e.g.: 70% positive.

(And thanks to the 3 folks who pushed my button! lol)

We actually looked at that when we relaunched the new version. But it was either a choice of positive/negative OR net score. I'm a proponent for the positive/negative because it shows more detail on how people react to you instead of the net. For instance, yours would be +3 net, while the guy with +103/-100 would also be +3 net, but it would be more obvious that he's been "around the block" more, as it were.

[CanRay]

My group's characters had a tendency of taking people "Around the block" a few times.

Their rep was intact, but other parts were not in such good shape.   

[Charybdis]

*points left*

The clown scares me. -1

I love it. +1 for creepy factor

[alt.account]

*points left*

The clown scares me. -1

I love it. +1 for creepy factor

Thank you.

[tzizimine]

Okay, apparently I'm blind or my search-fu is lacking... how exactly do you leave rep for other people?

[Patrick Goodman]

Under everybody's name are two links, one for "Applaud" and the other for "Smite." The former is positive rep feedback, the latter negative,

[Medicineman]

You just can't aplaud /smite yourself (which is totally Logical ImO  )
I don't like the Reputation system in SR, and I don't like it in a Forum
(especially if nobody can control it)

HokaHey
Medicineman

[tzizimine]

Under everybody's name are two links, one for "Applaud" and the other for "Smite." The former is positive rep feedback, the latter negative,

Is there a Post / Rank requirement you have to meet first? I ask because I don't see either feedback link.


(Thanks everyone for bearing with me)

[Patrick Goodman]

Not that I'm aware of. Do you have the check box for "Don't show other's avatars" checked in your "Look and Layout" section in your forum profile settings?

[tzizimine]

Nope... I can see all the avatars and so forth

And it's the same on Chrome, Firefox and IE

[Patrick Goodman]

Then I'm clueless as to how to help you out. Maybe a mod could step in, or someone who has more of a clue on this topic than I do....

[Critias]

What, exactly, do you see under Patrick Goodman's user name?  Line for line, in order?

[tzizimine]

Thanks anyway... consider yourself applauded in lieu of no links

[tzizimine]

What, exactly, do you see under Patrick Goodman's user name?  Line for line, in order?

I figured what the problem was.. apparently the links are covered unsigned scripts which was blocked in all three browsers... all set